The opposition from Anas Al-Tikriti and Azam Al-Tamimi to the UK's new counter-extremism law centers on concerns regarding its potential infringement on fundamental rights and liberties. Both activists argue that the legislation's broad definitions of extremism and heavy-handed approach risk stifling legitimate dissent and exacerbating social tensions, particularly within Muslim communities. They emphasize the importance of addressing underlying grievances and social inequalities as a more effective means of countering extremism, rather than resorting to punitive measures that could further marginalize already vulnerable populations. Additionally, they highlight the need for robust safeguards to prevent the law from being used as a tool for political repression or discriminatory targeting. Their opposition underscores the complexities inherent in balancing security concerns with respect for civil liberties, and their insights contribute to ongoing debates about the most effective strategies for combating extremism while upholding democratic values.